USPTO serial 76350525
LIDIA'S REGIONAL ITALIAN FLAVORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2893732Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIDIA'S REGIONAL ITALIAN FLAVORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Scardino
Anthony Scardino Kranjac Manuali & Viskovic LLP30 Wall Street12th FloorNew York, NY 10005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces for use on food | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |