USPTO serial 76350570
ADEPTRA: SOLUTION DESIGN WORKSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADEPTRA: SOLUTION DESIGN WORKSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Gambrel
KIMBERLY GAMBREL KILLWORTH, GOTTMAN, HAGAN & SCHAEFF, L LONE DAYTON CTRONE S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | commerce for technical consultation services, namely, the evaluation of intra-corporate computer and telecommunications systems for the purpose of developing and providing recommendations and specifications for the redesign or supplementation of such systems to facilitate real-time, interactive messaging and transactions; custom design of prototypes for intra-corporate computer and telecommunications systems to facilitate real-time, interactive messaging and transactions; technical consultation services regarding the electronic transmission of messages and data via voice telephone, text telephone, data telephone, personal digital assistants, facsimile, one-way and two-way pagers and global computer networks and other communications devices; technical consultation services regarding the personalization of parameters for information to be transmitted via a communications device or apparatus, to specify the content, timing and other conditions of the transmission, the device or apparatus to be used in making the transmission, and transaction preferences of the recipient of the information; telephony, computer telephony and data delivery services, namely providing an integrated global computer network/telephone service for web-based call-back, database-based call origination and connection, transaction facilitation, call management and call routing/load balancing; technical consultation services in the fields of customer relationship management, e-customer relationship management, sales force automation, customer participation management and marketing; and customization of the above services to client specifications, namely, providing information, consultation and advice to others regarding adapting and implementing the above services to meet the needs of their clients | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | installation, maintenance and customized design for others of computer software used to transmit information, provide interactive response menus, transmit responsive orders, instructions or other information, establish connections between the sender of information and other parties, track and manage the transmission of and responses to such messages, support delivery of information via additional devices, and personalize parameters for information to be transmitted; and providing information, consultation and advice to others regarding adapting and implementing the above software to meet the needs of their clients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |