USPTO serial 76350649
TALENTDEVELOPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2694248Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2003
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TALENTDEVELOPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn K. Przywara
Kathryn K. Przywara Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth StreetSuite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting training classes, seminars, courses, workshops and conferences, both on site and via the global computer networks in the areas of job analysis, employee interviewing, and management and leadership skills related to employee retention * excluding psychometric testing services * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |