USPTO serial 76350894
CORETRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2921087Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2005
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CORETRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MIAO-LI COUNTY, TW
Hsinchu, TW
Hsinchu, TW
TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL ZENDEL
DANIEL F. ZENDEL Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | finished electronic products, namely, liquid crystal display projectors, digital light processing projectors, liquid-crystal-on-silicon projectors, rear projection televisions, video wall displays, projection data monitors, optical engines, Internet televisions, Internet projection televisions, Internet projection displays, digital televisions, digital projection televisions, multimedia displays, multimedia projection displays, liquid crystal display televisions, liquid crystal display monitors, liquid crystal display network personal computers, liquid crystal display terminals, liquid crystal display personal computers, plasma televisions and displays | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORETRONIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Optoma Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Optoma Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CORETRONIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CORETRONIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |