USPTO serial 76350932
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVESTE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Personal communication services (PCS), telephone paging and data telecommunication network services, namely, voice mail, electronic mail serves automated dialing, message paging, message waiting notification, call logging all related services incidental thereto, electronic mail and voice mail and messaging services; telecommunication services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data, video, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, facsimile, text and video; private line voice, text frame relay telecommunication services; telecommunications network management services, namely, controlling the transmission of voice, data and video to point-to-point and multiple remote sites, activating telecommunications networks, arranging network protocols for the transmission of data and providing network extensions to multiple users for the transmission of data; provision of telecommunications connections to a global computer network, webcasting audio/visual programming via a global computer network, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network, all provided through fibre optic networks; telephone communications services; facsimile transmission services; provision of telecommunication access to signal coding and decoding, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, computer network and satellite transmissions; satellite communication transmission services; transmission and delivery of data by electronic means; cable television broadcasting; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the Internet, telecommunications, business, advertising, sports, games, music, finance, investment, insurance, transportation, travel, education and control of computer hardware; providing multiple user access to a global computer network; providing information in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |