USPTO serial 76351031
ROBERT LOUIS NEW YORK LONDON PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBERT LOUIS NEW YORK LONDON PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDGEWATER, NJ
Edgewater, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Greene, Esq
MICHAEL R GREENE ESQ GREENE & HOFFMAN, PC125 SUMMER ST 14TH FLBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's sportswear, namely, shirts polo's, t-shirts, pants, shorts, jog suits and sweaters, men's loungwear, namely, boxers, pajama tops and bottoms, shorts and matching tops, robes, and pajama pants, ladies' sportswear, namely, blouses, two-piece related coordinate top and bottoms, pants, shorts, and sweaters, ladies' career wear, namely, blouses, blazers, suits, skirts, dresses, pants and sweaters, ladies' loungwear, namely, pajama tops and bottoms, camisoles, tops, robes, nightshirts and pajama pants, ladies' active wear, namely jogging suits and sweat shirts | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |