Drawing for DERMA CARE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76351049

DERMA CARE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERMA CARE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer, Esq

TRADEMARK MANAGER MINNTECH CORPORATION14605 28TH AVE NPLYMOUTH, MN 55447UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF INFECTION CONTROL AND PROPER MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN HAND CONTACT BETWEEN DENTIST AND PATIENTACTIVEApr 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 25, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance