USPTO serial 76351121
LED BULLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LED BULLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Gornall
PAUL D GORNALL BARRISTER & SOLICITOR1820 - 355 BURRARD STVANCOUVER, BC V6Z 1K9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Surveillance video cameras and related products namely, mounting brackets, boxes covers, housings, domes, pan/ tilt motors, microphone modules, power supplies, battery packs, lens, infrared illuminators; light emitting diode illuminators | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |