USPTO serial 76351124
WIZKID OPTOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIZKID OPTOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D: Gornall
PAUL D: GORNALL BARRISTER & SOLICITOR1820 - 355 BURRARD STVANCOUVER, BC V6Z 1K9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Surveillance video cameras and related products namely, mounting brackets, boxes covers, housings, domes, pan/tilt motors, microphone modules, power supplies, battery packs, lens, infrared illuminators | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |