USPTO serial 76351169
STI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Feldman
MARK I FELDMAN PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photonic instrumentation for military and industrial use, namely, hyperspectral imaging units and multispectral imaging units, software for real-time, near-real-time, and non-real-time data acquisition, data processing, data simulation, data communication, data visualization, georegistration, and map generation, space-based object detection, aerial object detection, land-based object detection, seaborne object detection, underwater object detection, including submarine detection, mine detection, ordnance detection, animal detection, human detection, environmental surveying, coastal surveying, agricultural surveying, natural resource surveying, urban surveying, pollution mapping surveying, search and rescue, natural disaster monitoring, aerial photography, aerial photogrammetry, and medical diagnostic imaging photonic instrumentation including bathymetry, cancer detection, disease detection, chemical detection, and biological agent detection | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 1997 |
| 042 | Technical consultation and research in the field of space-based, airborne, seaborne, underwater, land-based, and handheld photonic instrumentation, namely hyperspectral imaging units and multispectral imaging units, software for real-time, near-real-time, and non-real-time data acquisition, data processing, data simulation, data communication, data visualization, georegistration, and map generation, space-based object detection, aerial object detection, land-based object detection, seaborne object detection, underwater object detection, including submarine detection, mine detection, ordnance detection, animal detection, human detection, environmental surveying, coastal surveying, agricultural surveying, natural resource surveying, urban surveying, pollution mapping surveying, search and rescue, natural disaster monitoring, aerial photography, aerial photogrammetry, and medical diagnostic imaging photonic instrumentation including bathymetry, cancer detection, disease detection, chemical detection, and biological agent detection | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |