USPTO serial 76351202
FRIZZ EXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIZZ EXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER COUSINS
PETER COUSINS GIBNEY ANTHONY & FLAHERTY LLP665 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, MILKS, BODY LOTIONS, PERFUMED SOAP, DEODORANTS, BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BUBBLE BATH, PERFUMED BODY LOTIONS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR CREAM AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR LOTIONS, HAIR POMADES, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR LACQUERS AND HAIR SHAMPOOS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES M.A.I. (MISS ANTILLES INTERNATIONAL)
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES M.A.I. (MISS ANTILLES INTERNATIONAL)
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named FRIZZ EXPERT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |