Drawing for TECHMARK MEDISCIENCE

USPTO serial 76351313

TECHMARK MEDISCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TECHMARK MEDISCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter C. Lando

PETER C LANDO LOWRIE LANDO & ANASTASI LLPRIVERFRONT OFFICE PK ONE MAIN STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information services, namely, compilation, dissemination and provision of business, commercial and company marketing and financial information; business appraisals; providing business information and business research services via computer; statistical information services; business research; provision of business statistical informationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 19, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 19, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 19, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 30, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance