Drawing for BST-INPOD

USPTO serial 76351400

BST-INPOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BST-INPOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. YATES DOWELL

A YATES DOWELL DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-4679UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPRISING NON-LIVING MATERIAL, NAMELY, INJECTABLE PREPARATIONS FOR THE RESTORATION OF DAMAGED OR DEGENERATED PLANTAR FAT PADS AND NATURAL FOOT CUSHIONS AND FOR FORMING IMPLANTABLE IN-SOLE CUSHIONSACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Aug 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Aug 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 6, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 16, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jun 16, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTENโ€”
Jun 11, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Dec 11, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Dec 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Dec 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Dec 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Dec 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Nov 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 15, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
May 14, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTENโ€”
Nov 14, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Nov 14, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Nov 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 12, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jun 10, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTENโ€”
Dec 7, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Dec 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Dec 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 6, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Jun 4, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTENโ€”
Mar 10, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Jun 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 10, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Oct 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Apr 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Apr 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Aug 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance