USPTO serial 76351669
HOLLYWOOD SOUND LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLLYWOOD SOUND LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Konrad J. Trope
HUTTON CENTRE CALLAHAN & BLAINE3 HUTTON CTR DR STE 900SANTA ANA, CA 92707-8722UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vehicle compact disk/audio cassette/AM/FM players, vehicle stereo speakers, vehicle audio amplifiers, vehicle audio equalizers and vehicle pro-audio woofers, vehicle isobaric woofers, vehicle high performance woofers, vehicle coaxial full range speakers, vehicle two-way component systems comprising low mass silver polypropylene composite cone, high temperature ASV voice coil, and butyl rubber surround with a soft silk dome tweeter, vehicle coaxial full range speaker, vehicle triaxial full range speaker, vehicle amplifiers, vehicle high current amplifiers, vehicle single band pass woofers, vehicle angle hatchback dynamic propylene woofers, vehicle speaker and dual amplifier systems in one, and high quality vehicle amplifier and speaker package combined as one, | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |