USPTO serial 76351777
SAHARA WATERMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAHARA WATERMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A Clark
KENNETH A CLARK RANKIN HILL PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 7000CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Road and traffic marking paint | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |