USPTO serial 76351847
WHITE FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4076UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communication hardware, namely radio transmitters, radio receivers, data reproduction devices, namely, video monitors, loudspeakers and computer software for the transmission, reception and reproduction of data signals; audio and video equipment namely, wireless loudspeakers, video monitors, cameras, and remote controls for radios and parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |