Drawing for FIREWOOD

USPTO serial 76351939

FIREWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FIREWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Executive toys namely toy guns, toy elastic band guns and targets, all aimed for sale to adults; parts, fittings and accessories for such goods, namely rubber bands and other ammunitionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance