USPTO serial 76351964
MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-5389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, long-term and short-term investments in businesses; financial consulting; financial management; holding company services, namely, acquisition, possession, development and administration of assets; providing working capital; providing financial information via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MONTPELIER RE HOLDINGS LTD.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |