USPTO serial 76352214
SPA SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2851384Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPA SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHASKA, MN
CHASKA, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
CHASKA, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R. FAIRBAIRN
DAVID R FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE, PCTHE KINNEY & LANGE BLDG312 S 3RD STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAM, BODY LOTIONS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY WASHES, SKIN CLEANSERS AND MOISTURIZERS, SKIN TONERS, SHOWER GELS AND NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, BATH FOAM, SHAVING FOAM, SOAPS, BABY OIL, BATH OIL, BODY OIL, MASSAGE OIL, SUNTAN OIL, AROMA THERAPY OILS, PERFUME OILS AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BDV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BDV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HIJ, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HIJ, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GOLDBERG CONSULTING LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SPA SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |