Drawing for ZOEGENE

USPTO serial 76352383

ZOEGENE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOEGENE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research, development, validation and testing services for others in the field of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticals and consultation related thereto; research, development, validation and testing services for establishing disease treatments based on gene and protein expression and/or activity; research services for discovering antibodies, antisense drugs, peptides, proteins and gene therapy drugs; medical and diagnostic service, namely, diagnosing preventing, and predicting disease, identifying hereditary risk factors, diagnostic testing, prognostic testing, gene and protein testing; computer information services, namely, providing databases in the field of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticals; computer database services, namely, creating and customizing database for others in the field of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 30, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance