USPTO serial 76352505
BUN AN RAT DEO VA KHONG BI DUT CACH DEM NAU LAI VAN NGON NHU THUONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2004
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUN AN RAT DEO VA KHONG BI DUT CACH DEM NAU LAI VAN NGON NHU THUONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danton K. Mak
Danton K. Mak Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson PC100 E. Corson StreetThird FloorPasadena, CA 91103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Staple foods, namely, [ rice ], rice noodles, rice sticks, rice vermicelli, vermicelli [ noodles and pasta ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKMAN CO. (U.S.A.), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKMAN CO. (U.S.A.), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKMAN CO. (U.S.A.), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BUN AN RAT DEO VA KHONG BI DUT CACH DEM NAU LAI VAN NGON NHU THUONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |