USPTO serial 76352644
UNIQUE-M.O.D.E.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIQUE-M.O.D.E.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-07745 Jena, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD H. KIEL
JENNIFER D SILVERMAN WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR & SOLIS-COHEN LLP250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical and opto-electronic devices and instruments, namely, optical lasers, fibre-optical and optical semiconductors for optical excitation, optical amplification, optical energy input and optical transfer mainly in material processing, printing technology, analytics, metrology, projection technology, telecommunication technology, data processing, packaging of integrated circuits, research and science; light-frequency converters and light-pulsers, light-shapers, light- amplifiers, light-scatterers, light-generators, optical lasers and light-emitters with fibre output, lasers and light-emitters with free beam outlet, lasers and light-emitters with thermo-electric cooling, namely, diode lasers, solid-state lasers, light-emitting diodes; optical semiconductor amplifiers, optical fibre amplifiers, laser diodes, optical and fibre-optical single components and assemblies for combination with laser diodes, light-emitting diodes, laser and light-emitters, namely, beam-shaper optics, coupler optics, collimators, objective lenses, modulators, reducers, beam splitters, beam combiners, beam deflectors, fibre cable assemblies for energy and signal transfer; mechanical, electromechanical and otoelectro-mechanical devices and instruments, namely, jigs and fixtures to grip and position mechanical, optical and opto-electronic positioners, adjusters, fixaters and contacters of mechanical, optical and opto-electronic components required to install such above mentioned devices and instruments; optical and micro-optical components, namely, prisms and prism arrays, lenses and lens arrays, grids and grid arrays, wave guides and wave guide arrays, radiators, cooling plates, optical fibres and optical-fibre arrays, reflectors and reflector arrays, active wave guides, namely, fibre lasers, fibre amplifiers, fibre cables, etalons, plates, diffractive components; electric operation control and drive units, namely, electric voltage and current control modules, Peltier elements, electric temperature-control modules and electric measurement and evaluation modules to serve any of the above named devices and instruments; semi conductor and opto-electronic devices, namely, mechanical and micro-mechanical components, namely, cassettes, fixtures and grippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design for optical, mechanical and electronic components and control programs for electric operation control and drive modules; creation of control programs for automated measurement, assembly, adjustment, and related visualization; design of optical and opto-electronic apparatus and instruments; design of optical and micro-optical components, namely, cassettes, fixtures and grippers; design of mechanical and micro-mechanical components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |