USPTO serial 76352645
OPEN MIND JOURNALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN MIND JOURNALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reed Smith
JENNIFER D SILVERMAN REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-7650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE; ELECTRONIC DATABASES IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE, RECORDED ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, TEXTS, PERIODICALS, MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATIONS, VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE RECORDED ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | EDUCATIONAL PUBLICATIONS AND TEACHING MATERIALS, NAMELY, JOURNALS AND TEXTS IN THE FIELDS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PUBLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL AND ACADEMIC REFERENCE BOOKS AND MAGAZINES, EXCLUDING ONLINE PUBLISHING OF BOOKS AND MAGAZINES; EDUCATIONAL, ACADEMIC AND REFERENCE TEXT LENDING LIBRARIES; RENTAL OF FILMS, VIDEOS AND AUDIO RECORDINGS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ACADEMIC PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named OPEN MIND JOURNALS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |