USPTO serial 76352726
BEST HOME PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEST HOME PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Riverside, CT
Riverside, CT
STANARDSVILLE, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen P. McNamara
STEPHEN P MCNAMARAST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON ET AL986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5621Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE AND FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS, NAMELY PERFUME, TOILET WATER, BODY SPRAY, BODY AND SKIN SOAP, HAIR SHAMPOO, BATH OILS, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, FACIAL AND BODY SCRUBS, SKIN MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, DEODORANTS AND ANTIPERSPIRANTS, BODY POWDER; COSMETICS, NAMELY LIPSTICK, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, MAKE-UP LOTIONS AND POWDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leix, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Leix, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BEST CANDLE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named BEST HOME PRODUCTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |