USPTO serial 76352815
BLAST PROTECTION SCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLAST PROTECTION SCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard I. Sobelman
SNELL & WILMER LLP400 E VAN BURENONE ARIZONA CTR - IP DEPTPHOENIX, AZ 85004-0001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Shadecloth, namely cloth * used * in making shades for mitigating the destructive effects of flying debris | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |