Drawing for YAN CAN WOK

USPTO serial 76352870

YAN CAN WOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YAN CAN WOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Joy Kattwinkel

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RESTAURANTS, QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANTS, BAR SERVICES AND CATERING SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF RESTAURANTS AND QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance