USPTO serial 76352891
IMPROVING THE ECONOMICS OF STREAMING DELIVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPROVING THE ECONOMICS OF STREAMING DELIVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather E. Balmat
HEATHER E BALMAT TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLP125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110-2704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer hardware and software for the delivery of streaming media over a global computer network; communications via a global computer network or the internet; electronic mail and message sending and receiving services; broadcasting services; provision of web pages; transmission and distribution of data or audiovisual images via a global computer network or the internet; computer hardware and software consulting; computer programming; support and consultation services for managing computer systems, databases and applications; graphic design for the compilation of web pages on the internet; information relating to computer hardware or software provided online from a global computer network or the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |