Drawing for AIRPICS

USPTO serial 76352952

AIRPICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRPICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARVEY B. JACOBSON, JR.

HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic digital image capture system for video surveillance and security, namely - digital video processor for capturing, storing and displaying pre-alarm or live video images and data from closed circuit security television cameras; converting said images and data to a digital stream for storage and/or transmission of same to a ground station capable of interacting with and controlling said digital video processor; steering, panning, tilting and/or focusing cameras and controls for external devices; and engaging relays for controlling other devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance