USPTO serial 76352963
BEDD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3151198Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEDD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THE PLAZA #16-321, SG
THE PLAZA #16-321, SG
THE PLAZA #16-321, SG
Simi Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR S GARRETT
ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for electronic communication devices and portable communication devices, namely computers, cellular and mobile telephones and portable digital assistants, used for arranging dates and meetings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2006 |
| 045 | Dating services, video dating services and computer dating services in the nature of arranging dates and meetings tailored to the needs of individuals; social introduction agencies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON, STEPHEN J.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON, STEPHEN J.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON, STEPHEN J.
- Other trademarks owned by Bedd Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BEDD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |