Drawing for EVOLUTION ROBOTICS

USPTO serial 76352968

EVOLUTION ROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVOLUTION ROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Walker

Elizabeth A. Walker Choate Hall & Stewart LLPTwo International PlaceBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Website featuring information concerning remote control robot operation, chat rooms, e-commerce, bandwidth management and security managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance