Drawing for OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY TECHNOLOGIST

USPTO serial 76353475

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY TECHNOLOGIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2783375Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2003
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY TECHNOLOGIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne E. Naffziger

Anne E. Naffziger LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, SUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
BHealth and safety technologist evaluation services in the field of occupational health and safetySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 11, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 29, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 29, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 201389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Oct 22, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 3, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 24, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 11, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 10, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance