USPTO serial 76353572
HOFBRAU MUNCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOFBRAU MUNCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thilo C. Agthe
THILO C AGTHE WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 WALL ST 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | glassware, porcelain and earthenware; namely cups, mugs, beverage glassware, tap handles, plates and bowls; and housewares; namely serving trays not of precious metal, bottle openers, insulated food and beverage storage containers and bread baskets, and household utensils and containers; namely containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal, dinnerware, beverage glassware, salt and pepper shakers, and cookware; namely pots and pans | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | bed and textile table covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STAATLICHES HOFBRAUHAUS IN MUNCHEN
- Other trademarks owned by STAATLICHES HOFBRAUHAUS IN MUNCHEN
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named HOFBRAU MUNCHEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |