USPTO serial 76353587
BR 27
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BR 27?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baldwin Park, CA
Baldwin Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Monroe
LINDA MONROE HARRIS & MONROE5995 S SEPULVEDA BLVD 3RD FLCULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's casual wearing apparel, namely knit and woven jackets, blouses, pants, shorts, skirts, shirts; outerwear, namely, jackets and sweaters, sweatshirts, swimwear, and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |