USPTO serial 76353700
HOTTEST CHILE IN TOWN!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOTTEST CHILE IN TOWN!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo Anne Hagen
Jo Anne Hagen HAGEN & MELUSKY, INC.SUITE B, LOWER LEVEL1613 PELICAN LAKES POINTWINDSOR, CO 80550Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services featuring Mexican food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |