Drawing for DETROIT ELECTRONIC MUSIC FESTIVAL

USPTO serial 76353714

DETROIT ELECTRONIC MUSIC FESTIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DETROIT ELECTRONIC MUSIC FESTIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn Y. Ettricks

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON LLP3000 TWO LOGAN SQ18TH & ARCH STSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail music sales in the field of musicACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of live music concerts, live performances by musical bands and rock groups, and music festivalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 6, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance