USPTO serial 76353820
CELEBRATE! BY SPECIAL OCCASION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELEBRATE! BY SPECIAL OCCASION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clintonville, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Furay
CATHERINE J FURAY MURPHY & DESMOND, SCP O BOX 2038MADISON, WI 53701-2038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Party favors in the nature of small toys, namely blow-outs consisting of a plastic mouthpiece and paper body; horns consisting of a plastic mouthpiece and paper body; play wands, toy necklaces consisting of plastic and cord, plastic toy microphones, toy eye patches, plastic toy cameras, plastic trucks, toy rubber balls, plastic coins, three dimensional (3D) glasses consisting of paper and plastic film, toy key chains, toy jewelry, bead jewelry kits, balloon noise makers, toy party favors and children's play cosmetics | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |