Drawing for ENDURANCE

USPTO serial 76354106

ENDURANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VIVIAN POLAK

VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF LAMB GREENE & MACRAE LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INSURANCE, COMMERCIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE, PROPERTY FACULTATIVE REINSURANCE, CASUALTY FACULTATIVE REINSURANCE, PROPERTY TREATY REINSURANCE, CASUALTY TREATY REINSURANCE, WORKER'S COMPENSATION REINSURANCE, AVIATION AND SPACE INSURANCE, AVIATION AND SPACE REINSURANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 1, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance