USPTO serial 76354200
SEDONA SHUTTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2818007Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEDONA SHUTTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
ANAHEIM, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitch Milstein
MITCH MILSTEIN RUTAN & TUCKER LLP611 ANTON BLVD 14TH FLCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | WINDOW COVERING, NAMELY, WOOD SHUTTERS AND POLYMER SHUTTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 3 Day Blinds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3 Day Blinds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3 Day Blinds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 3 DAY BLINDS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SEDONA SHUTTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |