Drawing for PROACT3

USPTO serial 76354217

PROACT3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROACT3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith M. Stolte

KEITH M STOLTE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009network interface units and electronic mountings used to facilitate telecommunications and network transmissions; DS3network interface units and electronic mountings used to facilitate telecommunications and network transmissions; Megajacks, litejacks, and quadjacks used to facilitate telecommunications and network transmissions; network interface unit-related software networking software used to facilitate telecommunications and network transmissions; software and hard ware designed to provide multiple users and multiple computer units common access to a global computer network; software and hardware designed to provide multiple users and multiple computer units common access to DSL and ADSL lines; modems; broadband modems; and other telecommunications equipment, namely, residual gateways and routersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance