USPTO serial 76354258
CONTENT OBJECT ARCHITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2765884Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONTENT OBJECT ARCHITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7RF, GB
Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7RF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management in the field of application infrastructure; application software, namely, computer software for application and database integration; computer software adapted for use in the operation of computers, namely, computer utility programs; computer software for communication purposes over an internal and external network between digital devices and mainframe computers, mobile telephones, interactive televisions and computer kiosks; network management computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Licensing of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Internet services provisions, namely, providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; delivery and management of applications from remote data centers to multiple users via the Internet or a private network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Application service provision, namely, hosting software applications for others; maintenance of computer software via the Internet or private network; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management via the Internet or a private network; hosting of digital content on the Internet; Internet development services in the nature of computer services, namely creating, maintaining and designing web sites for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AssetHouse Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by AssetHouse Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONTENT OBJECT ARCHITECTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |