USPTO serial 76354341
VITAL BASICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITAL BASICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAROL A. KEPCHAR
KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, skin care and body products, namely, skin creams, skin lotions, skin cleansers, skin toners, skin moisturizers, skin masks, non-medicated lip conditioners, bath gels, body lotions, hand creams, body oils, body powders, skin soaps, hair care preparations, household cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |