USPTO serial 76354358
Serial No. 76354358
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76354358?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 1B2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Carlsen
ANN CARLSEN COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESBOX 12109, STE 2200555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely; boots and shoes, sneakers, hiking shoes, mountain climbing shoes, leisure shoes, sailing shoes, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, ski and snowboard boots, after-ski shoes and boots, internal and external soles, inner soles for the support of the arch on the foot | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |