USPTO serial 76354359
ARC'TERYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARC'TERYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 1B2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Carlsen
ANN CARLSEN COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESBOX 12109, STE 2200555 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely-- boots and shoes, sneakers, hiking shoes, mountain climbing shoes, leisure shoes, sailing shoes, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, ski and snowboard boots, after-ski shoes and boots, internal and external soles, inner soles for the support of the arch on the foot | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |