USPTO serial 76354389
STEINBICHLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2876034Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 2004
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEINBICHLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-83115 Neubeuern, DE
NEUBEUERN, DE
83115 Neubeuern, DE
83115 Neubeuern, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald S. Kadden
Ronald S. Kadden Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL MEASUREMENT AND TEST SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF LASER BEAMS, SCANNERS, SENSOR HEAD, A CONTROLLER, A HIGH-PERFORMANCE PERSONAL COMPUTER WITH OPERATING SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC SPECKLE-PATTERN INTERFEROMETER FOR DEFORMATION AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS, 3-D SCANNER, INTACT TIRE TREAD TESTER; OPTICAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR TESTING SURFACES COMPRISED OF A GRID PROJECTOR OR LASER SCANNER, SENSORS, CAMERA WITH A CHARGE COUPLED DEVICE (CCD) CHIP OR COMPLEMENTARY METAL OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR (CMOS) CHIP, PERSONAL COMPUTER WITH OPERATING SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE; OPTICAL TEST SYSTEMS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION OF MATERIALS COMPRISED OF LASER INTERFEROMETER, SENSORS, CCD-CHIP CAMERA, AND SOFTWARE; INTERFEROMETERS, NAMELY, HOLOGRAPHIC INTERFEROMETERS AND ELECTRONIC SPECKLE-PATTERN INTERFEROMETERS; DIGITIZERS, NAMELY, 3-D DIGITIZERS; SCANNERS, NAMELY, 3-D SCANNERS; TRICOLITE SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF A LASER BEAM OR A GRID ON A POSITION SENSITIVE DEVICE (PSD) OR ON A CCD OR CMOS CHIP DEVICE TO MEASURE THE 3-D COORDINATES AND DIMENSIONS OF POINTS ON THE SURFACE OF A SAMPLE; OPTICAL SURFACE INSPECTION SYSTEM PRODUCT COMPRISED OF GRID PROJECTOR, CCD-CHIP CAMERA FOR DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF FLAWS ON A SMOOTH SURFACE; OPTICAL 3-D DIGITIZING SCANNING SYSTEM COMPRISED OF SENSORS AND SOFTWARE FOR ACQUIRING AND PROCESSING DATA FOR THE GENERATION OF IMAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | MATERIALS TESTING FOR OTHERS USING DEFORMATION AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS, NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING, QUALITY CONTROL FOR OTHERS USING DEFORMATION AND VIBRATION ANALYSIS, NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING, AND DIGITAL IMAGING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS OPTOTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEINBICHLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |