USPTO serial 76354549
HARVEST TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARVEST TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Harvest Technology Corporation
Wood-Ridge, NJ
Harvest Technology Corporation
Wood-Ridge, NJ
Harvest Technology Corporation
Wood-Ridge, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry H. Fishkin
BARRY H FISHKIN PHILLIPS NIZER BENJAMIN KRIM & BALLON LL666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SITE AND APPLICATION DESIGN, WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTATION RELATING THERETO FOR THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harvest Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Harvest Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Harvest Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HARVEST TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |