USPTO serial 76354579
ONION FINGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONION FINGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CONAGRA FOODS CANADA INC./ALIMENTS CONAGRA CANADA INC.
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by CONAGRA FOODS CANADA INC./ALIMENTS CONAGRA CANADA INC.
Boisbriand, Quebec, CA
Boisbriand, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Bikus
CHRISTOPHER M BIKUS MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLOSTE 3700 FIRST NATIONAL TWR1601 DODGE STOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | BATTER COATED VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONAGRA FOODS CANADA INC./ALIMENTS CONAGRA CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Frozen Foods, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Frozen Foods, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ONION FINGERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |