Drawing for EMD LEXIGEN

USPTO serial 76354586

EMD LEXIGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMD LEXIGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1300NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products for the treatment of cancer, MDS, genetic disorders and immunological disorders; novel protein drugs for use in the area of oncology, immune therapies and for the treatment of metabolic disordersACTIVE—
042Scientific research and development in the area of pharmacy, medicine, biology and genetics, developing treatments for serious and life-threatening diseases as well as broad technology platforms that will lead to new therapiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 6, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 19, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 19, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance