USPTO serial 76354710
EIF ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EIF ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seth Periman
SETH PERLMAN PERLMAN & PERLMAN LLP41 MADISON AVE STE 4000NEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund raising services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |