USPTO serial 76354756
AGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean A. Pelletier
DEAN A PELLETIER MCANDREWS, HELD, & MALLOY, LTDCITICORP CTR 34TH FL500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SPECTACLE CASES, SPECTACLE FRAMES AND SPECTACLE GLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER TRAVELLING BAGS, BEACH BAGS, HANDBAGS, RUCKSACKS, SUITCASES, UMBRELLAS, WALLETS AND PURSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SWIMWEAR, FOOTWEAR, HATS, COATS, FROCKS, GLOVES, BELTS, HOSIERY, JACKETS, JUMPERS, KNITWEAR, NAMELY KNITTED PULLOVERS AND KNITTED SCARVES, MITTENS, PAJAMAS, PANTS, SCARVES, SOCKS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, TROUSERS, UNDERWEAR AND WAISTCOATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |