USPTO serial 76354850
VERIDYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERIDYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BROOMALL, PA
BROOMALL, PA
BROOMALL, PA
Shepard-Patterson and Associates, Inc.
Broomall, PA
Other trademarks owned by Shepard-Patterson and Associates, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestiaP.O. Box 15961007 Orange Street, Suite 1100Wilmington, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT OF ACCOUNTING FUNCTIONS, AUDITING PROCESSES, MATERIAL ANALYSES, LOGISTICS SUPPORT, PROCUREMENT, INVENTORY, AND WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS; PRODUCT DEMONSTRATIONS; AND PURCHASING MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, PURCHASING OF EQUIPMENT, COMPONENTS AND PARTS AND DESIGN OF ASSET AND INVENTORY CONTROLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2002 |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE INTO COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEMS, COMPUTER HARDWARE ASSEMBLY, COMPUTER HARDWARE UPGRADING, COMPUTER NETWORK HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, AND COMPUTER NETWORK HARDWARE MAINTENANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2002 |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE OF COMPUTERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER-BASED TRAINING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2002 |
| 042 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT, NAMELY, EVALUATING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY NEEDS, DOCUMENTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS, AND DEVELOPING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, SOFTWARE DESIGN, SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION, SOFTWARE TESTING, MANAGEMENT OF SOFTWARE LOGISTICS, AND SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION; WEB ENABLED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HELP DESK AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT; AND TECHNICAL WRITING FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, WRITING RELEASE NOTES, MANUALS, REFERENCE GUIDES, TECHNICAL PAPERS, AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VERIDYNE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERIDYNE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERIDYNE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Shepard-Patterson and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERIDYNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |